The flurry of activity in the courts and in Congress demonstrated vividly how deep the controversy over the President’s wall project has already become. There also is some discussion in Congress of new measures to curtail the power that presidents have to declare national emergencies, under a law enacted in 1976 – the legal basis for Trump’s latest plan for a wall that he has been advocating for five years, in private and public life. But, if it were enacted, the President could veto it. Such a declaration could force a vote in both houses of Congress to test the members’ views on the controversial wall project. House of Representatives drafted a proposed measure to formally disapprove of the President’s declaration of a national emergency, which he did on Friday as a way to justify moving ahead with the border wall without money expressly voted by Congress for that purpose. Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. Those cases were filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., Friday and Saturday.Īll of the lawsuits rely, in part, on the President’s own statement on Friday that he actually did not need to declare a national emergency in order to move ahead with the wall’s construction but chose that method as the fastest way to get the job done. The sweeping new lawsuit followed two other constitutional challenges to the President’s plans in court cases started over the weekend by landowners, and environmental and wildlife groups with interests in border areas where parts of a wall would be built. and Mexico unless Congress explicitly approves money to pay for it. Arguing that President Trump is pushing the nation “toward a constitutional crisis of his own making,” a group of 16 states asked a federal court in California on Monday night to block the federal government from building a wall along the border between the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |